89 FR 225 pgs. 92266-92269 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Schedule of Credits at Equity 7, Section 118(a)
Type: NOTICEVolume: 89Number: 225Pages: 92266 - 92269
Pages: 92266, 92267, 92268, 92269Docket number: [Release No. 34-101638; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2024-066]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2024-27218 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-101638; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2024-066]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Schedule of Credits at Equity 7, Section 118(a)
November 15, 2024.
[top] Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act"), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on November 1, 2024, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Footnotes:
1 ?15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 ?17 CFR 240.19b-4.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's schedule of credits at Equity 7, Section 118(a), as described further below.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's schedule of credits, at Equity 7, Section 118(a). Specifically, the Exchange proposes to introduce a new credit applicable to Tapes A, B, and C for displayed quotes (other than Supplemental Orders) that provide liquidity. Under the proposed rule change, members will be eligible for the new credit of $0.0029 if they meet the following criteria: (1) the member adds at least 0.50% of the Consolidated Volume, with at least 0.10% of such volume being Tape B securities; and (2) the member adds at least 0.15% of Consolidated Volume of non-displayed liquidity, which includes midpoint orders and Midpoint Extended Life Orders ("M-ELO").
This proposed change will apply to Tapes A, B, and C. The purpose of the new credit structure is to incentivize members to increase their liquidity adding activity on the Exchange. By providing an additional incentive for members to contribute displayed liquidity, the Exchange aims to enhance market quality and improve liquidity.
The new proposed credit of $0.0029 is in addition to other credits the Exchange already offers to member for providing displayed liquidity. The Exchange believes that if this incentive successfully drives additional liquidity, the resulting increase will enhance overall market quality, benefiting all participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act, 3 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act, 4 in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
Footnotes:
3 ?15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
4 ?15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
The Proposal Is Reasonable
The Exchange's proposed change to its schedule of credits is reasonable in several respects. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is subject to significant competitive forces in the market for equity securities transaction services that constrain its pricing determinations in that market. The fact that this market is competitive has long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: "[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker dealers'. . .."? 5
Footnotes:
5 ? NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system "has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies."? 6
Footnotes:
6 ?Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) ("Regulation NMS Adopting Release").
Numerous indicia demonstrate the competitive nature of this market. For example, clear substitutes to the Exchange exist in the market for equity security transaction services. The Exchange is only one of several equity venues to which market participants may direct their order flow. Competing equity exchanges offer similar tiered pricing structures to that of the Exchange, including schedules of rebates and fees that apply based upon members achieving certain volume thresholds.
Within this environment, market participants can freely and often do shift their order flow among the Exchange and competing venues in response to changes in their respective pricing schedules. As such, the proposal represents a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase its liquidity and market share relative to its competitors.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to establish a new credit of $0.0029 for members that add displayed liquidity when the member adds at least 0.50% of Consolidated Volume, of which at least 0.10% are Tape B securities, and the member adds at least 0.15% of Consolidated Volume of non-displayed liquidity (including midpoint orders) and Midpoint Extended Life Orders. This proposal is reasonable because it will incentivize liquidity adding activity and provide an incentive to members that provide additional displayed liquidity to the Exchange. The Exchange believes that if such incentive is effective, then any ensuring increase in liquidity to the Exchange will improve market quality, to the benefit of all participants.
[top] The Exchange believes that establishing a new credit for members that add displayed liquidity is equitable. To the extent that the Exchange succeeds in increasing the levels of liquidity and activity on the Exchange, the Exchange will experience improvements in its market quality, which stands to benefit all market participants. The Exchange further believes that the proposed new credit of
Any participant that is dissatisfied with the proposal is free to shift their order flow to competing venues that provide more generous pricing or less stringent qualifying criteria.
The Proposal Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposed $0.0029 new credit for members adding additional liquidity is not unfairly discriminatory. As an initial matter, the Exchange believes that nothing about its volume-based tiered pricing model is inherently unfair; instead, it is a rational pricing model that is well-established and ubiquitous in today's economy among firms in various industries-from co-branded credit cards to grocery stores to cellular telephone data plans-that use it to reward the loyalty of their best customers that provide high levels of business activity and incent other customers to increase the extent of their business activity. It is also a pricing model that the Exchange and its competitors have long employed with the assent of the Commission. It is fair because it enhances price discovery and improves the overall quality of the equity markets.
The Exchange believes that the proposal to add a new credit for members providing additional displayed liquidity (other than Supplemental Orders) as described above, is not unfairly discriminatory. The new credit is not intended to advantage any particular member and will be applied uniformly to all members that meet the qualifying criteria. Moreover, the proposal stands to improve the overall market quality of the Exchange, to the benefit of all market participants, by incentivizing members to increase the extent of their liquidity adding activity.
Any participant that is dissatisfied with the proposal is free to shift their order flow to competing venues that provide more generous pricing or less stringent qualifying criteria.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that its proposal will place any category of Exchange participant at a competitive disadvantage.
As noted above, the Exchange's proposal to add a new credit for members that add displayed liquidity is intended to have market-improving effects, to the benefit of all members. Any member can satisfy the criteria to qualify for the new credit.
The Exchange notes that its members are free to trade on other venues to the extent they believe that the Exchange's fee schedule is not attractive. As one can observe by looking at any market share chart, price competition between exchanges is fierce, with liquidity and market share moving freely between exchanges in reaction to fee and credit changes.
Intermarket Competition
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its credits and fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their credit and own fees in response, and because market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which credit or fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.
The proposed new credit is reflective of this competition because, as a threshold issue, even as one of the largest U.S. equities exchanges by volume, the Exchange has less than 20% market share, which in most markets could hardly be categorized as having enough market power to burden competition. Moreover, price competition between exchanges is fierce, with liquidity and market share moving freely between exchanges in reaction to credit and fee changes. This is an addition to free flow of order flow to and among off-exchange venues which comprises more than 40% of industry volume in recent months.
The Exchange's proposal to add a new credit is pro-competitive in that the Exchange intends for the credit to increase liquidity addition activity on the Exchange, thereby rendering the Exchange more attractive and vibrant to participants.
In sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impair the ability of members or competing order execution venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. 7
Footnotes:
7 ?15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission's internet comment form ( https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include file number SR-NASDAQ-2024-066 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
[top] All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2024-066. This file number should be included on the
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 8
Footnotes:
8 ?17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Stephanie J. Fouse,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-27218 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P