88 FR 238 pgs. 86318-86320 - Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021
Type: NOTICEVolume: 88Number: 238Pages: 86318 - 86320
Pages: 86318, 86319, 86320Docket number: [C-580-888]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2023-27354 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]
Agency: Commerce Department
Sub Agency: International Trade Administration
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-580-888]
Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to POSCO, a producer and exporter of certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to-length plate (CTL plate) from the Republic of Korea (Korea), during the period of review (POR) from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021.
DATES:
Applicable December 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[top] Faris Montgomery, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 6, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review in the Federal Register . 1 On August 9, 2023, Commerce released a post-preliminary analysis memorandum regarding the provision of electricity for less than adequate remuneration and electricity for more than adequate remuneration programs. 2 Between August 29 and September 1, 2023, Commerce conducted on-site verification of the questionnaire responses submitted by the Government of Korea. 3
Footnotes:
1 ? See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021, 88 FR 37019 (June 6, 2023) ( Preliminary Results ), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 ? See Memorandum, "Post-Preliminary Analysis," dated August 9, 2023.
3 ? See Memorandum, "Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of the Government of Korea for the Provision of Electricity for Less than Adequate Remuneration Program," dated September 28, 2023.
On September 6, 2023, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of this review to no later than December 1, 2023. 4 For a complete description of the events that followed the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 5
Footnotes:
4 ? See Memorandum, "Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review," dated September 6, 2023.
5 ? See Memorandum, "Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Republic of Korea; 2021," dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
We conducted this review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order? 6
Footnotes:
6 ? See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Republic of Korea: Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 24103 (May 25, 2017) ( Order ).
The merchandise covered by the Order is CTL plate. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties' briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed is attached to this notice at the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the case and rebuttal briefs and the evidence on the record, we made certain changes to POSCO's countervailable subsidy calculations from the Preliminary Results. These changes are explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific. 7 The Issues and Decision Memorandum contains a full description of the methodology underlying Commerce's conclusions.
Footnotes:
7 ? See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.307(b)(iv), in August 2023, Commerce conducted an on-site verification of the subsidy information reported by the Government of Korea. We used standard on-site verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting records and original source documents provided by the respondent.
Final Results of Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we calculated an individual net countervailable subsidy rate for POSCO. Commerce determines that, during the POR, the net countervailable subsidy rate for the producers/exporter under review is as follows:
Footnotes:
8 ?As discussed in the Preliminary Results, Commerce found the following companies to be cross-owned with POSCO: Pohang Scrap Recycling Distribution Center Co. Ltd.; POSCO Chemical Co., Ltd.; POSCO M-Tech Co., Ltd.; POSCO Nippon Steel RHF Joint Venture Co., Ltd.; POSCO SPS Co., Ltd.; and POSCO Terminal Co., Ltd. The subsidy rate applies to all cross-owned companies. We note that POSCO has an affiliated trading company through which it exported certain subject merchandise during the POR, POSO International (aka POSCO International Corporation). POSCO International was not selected as a mandatory respondent but was examined in the context of POSCO. Therefore, there is not an established countervailing duty rate for POSCO International; POSCO International's subsidies are accounted for in POSCO's total subsidy rate. Instead, entries of subject merchandise exported by POSCO International will receive the rate of the producer listed on the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry form. Thus, the subsidy rate applied to POSCO and POSCO's cross-owned companies is also applied to POSCO International for entries of subject merchandise produced by POSCO.
| Producer/exporter | Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem ) |
|---|---|
| POSCO? 8 | 0.87 |
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with the final results of review to parties in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review, for the above-listed company at the applicable ad valorem assessment rate. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired ( i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
[top] In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amount shown for the company listed above based on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review. 9 For all non-reviewed firms subject to the Order, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent
Footnotes:
9 ? See, e.g., Honey from Argentina: Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 69 FR 29518 (May 24, 2004), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Issue 4.
10 ? See Order, 82 FR at 24103.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 1, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Discussion of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Electricity is Subsidized by the Government of Korea (GOK)
Comment 2: Whether the Provision of Korea Emissions Trading System (K-ETS) Permits is Countervailable
Comment 3: Whether the Benchmark Calculations for Electricity for More than Adequate Remuneration (MTAR) Should Differentiate for Time-of-Use
Comment 4: Whether Certain of POSCO SPS Co. Ltd.'s (POSCO SPS) Industrial Technology Innovation Promotion Act (ITIPA) Grants are Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise
Comment 5: Whether Certain of POSCO Chemical Co., Ltd.'s (POSCO Chemical) Local Tax Exemptions under the Restriction of Special Local Taxation Act (RSLTA) Article 78 are Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise
Comment 6: Whether Certain Quota Tariff Import Duty Exemptions under Article 71 of the Customs Act are Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023-27354 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P