87 FR 132 pgs. 41288-41290 - Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico

Type: NOTICEVolume: 87Number: 132Pages: 41288 - 41290
Docket number: [RTID 0648-XC103]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2022-14740 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
Agency: Commerce Department
Sub Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Official PDF Version:  PDF Version
Pages: 41288, 41289, 41290

[top] page 41288

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XC103]

Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico

AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:

Notice of issuance of Letter of Authorization.

SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as amended, its implementing regulations, and NMFS' MMPA Regulations for Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico, notification is hereby given that a Letter of Authorization (LOA) has been issued to QuarterNorth Energy LLC (QuarterNorth) for the take of marine mammals incidental to geophysical survey activity in the Gulf of Mexico.

DATES:

The LOA is effective from July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

ADDRESSES:

The LOA, LOA request, and supporting documentation are available online at: www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-oil-and-gas-industry-geophysical-survey-activity-gulf-mexico. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ben Laws, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. ) direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is provided to the public for review.

An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings are set forth. NMFS has defined "negligible impact" in 50 CFR 216.103 as an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival.


[top] Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA defines "harassment" as: any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, page 41289 feeding, or sheltering (Level B harassment).

On January 19, 2021, we issued a final rule with regulations to govern the unintentional taking of marine mammals incidental to geophysical survey activities conducted by oil and gas industry operators, and those persons authorized to conduct activities on their behalf (collectively "industry operators"), in Federal waters of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (GOM) over the course of 5 years (86 FR 5322; January 19, 2021). The rule was based on our findings that the total taking from the specified activities over the 5-year period will have a negligible impact on the affected species or stock(s) of marine mammals and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of those species or stocks for subsistence uses. The rule became effective on April 19, 2021.

Our regulations at 50 CFR 217.180 et seq. allow for the issuance of LOAs to industry operators for the incidental take of marine mammals during geophysical survey activities and prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat (often referred to as mitigation), as well as requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such taking. Under 50 CFR 217.186(e), issuance of an LOA shall be based on a determination that the level of taking will be consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under these regulations and a determination that the amount of take authorized under the LOA is of no more than small numbers.

Summary of Request and Analysis

QuarterNorth plans to conduct a single checkshot velocity survey within Green Canyon OCS Lease Block 39. See Section 1.1 of QuarterNorth's application for a map. QuarterNorth plans to use an 8-element, 1,170 cubic inch (in 3 ) airgun array. Please see QuarterNorth's application for additional detail.

Consistent with the preamble to the final rule, the survey effort proposed by QuarterNorth in its LOA request was used to develop LOA-specific take estimates based on the acoustic exposure modeling results described in the preamble (86 FR 5322, 5398; January 19, 2021). In order to generate the appropriate take number for authorization, the following information was considered: (1) survey type; (2) location (by modeling zone? 1 ); (3) number of days; and (4) season. 2 The acoustic exposure modeling performed in support of the rule provides 24-hour exposure estimates for each species, specific to each modeled survey type in each zone and season.

Footnotes:

1 ?For purposes of acoustic exposure modeling, the GOM was divided into seven zones. Zone 1 is not included in the geographic scope of the rule.

2 ?For purposes of acoustic exposure modeling, seasons include Winter (December-March) and Summer (April-November).

No checkshot velocity surveys were included in the modeled survey types, and use of existing proxies ( i.e., 2D, 3D NAZ, 3D WAZ, Coil) is generally conservative for use in evaluation of these survey types. Summary descriptions of these modeled survey geometries are available in the preamble to the proposed rule (83 FR 29212, 29220; June 22, 2018). Coil was selected as the best available proxy survey type for QuarterNorth checkshot survey because the spatial coverage of the planned surveys is most similar to the coil survey pattern. For the planned survey, a single checkshot velocity survey for the collection of borehole seismic data is planned to occur at the surface above a well head located in approximately 1,923 feet (ft) of water. Receivers will be lowered directly into the well from a wireline. There will be no towing or movement of the airgun array, as it will be operated at a static location above the well. The coil survey pattern in the model was assumed to cover approximately 144 kilometers squared (km 2 ) per day (compared with approximately 795 km 2 , 199 km 2 , and 845 km 2 per day for the 2D, 3D NAZ, and 3D WAZ survey patterns, respectively). Among the different parameters of the modeled survey patterns ( e.g., area covered, line spacing, number of sources, shot interval, total simulated pulses), NMFS considers area covered per day to be most influential on daily modeled exposures exceeding Level B harassment criteria. Because QuarterNorth's planned survey is expected to cover no additional area as a stationary source the coil proxy is most representative of the effort planned by QuarterNorth in terms of predicted Level B harassment.

In addition, all available acoustic exposure modeling results assume use of a 72-element, 8,000 in 3 array. Thus, estimated take numbers for this LOA are considered conservative due to the differences in both the airgun array (8-elements, 1,170 in 3 ), and in daily survey area planned by QuarterNorth (as mentioned above), as compared to those modeled for the rule.

The survey is planned to occur for a maximum of 1 day in Zone 5. The survey may occur in either season. Therefore, the take estimates for each species are based on the season that has the greater value for the species ( i.e., winter or summer).

In this case, use of the exposure modeling produces results that are smaller than average GOM group sizes for multiple species (Maze-Foley and Mullin, 2006). NMFS' typical practice in such a situation is to increase exposure estimates to the assumed average group size for a species in order to ensure that, if the species is encountered, exposures will not exceed the authorized take number. However, other relevant considerations here lead to a determination that increasing the estimated exposures to average group sizes would likely lead to an overestimate of actual potential take. In this circumstance, the very short survey duration (six hours over the course of a day) and relatively small Level B harassment isopleths produced through use of the 8-element, 1,170 in 3 airgun array (compared with the modeled 72-element, 8,000 in 3 array) mean that it is unlikely that certain species would be encountered at all, much less that the encounter would result in exposure of a greater number of individuals than is estimated through use of the exposure modeling results. As a result, in this case NMFS has not increased the estimated exposure values to assumed average group sizes in authorizing take.

Based on the results of our analysis, NMFS has determined that the level of taking authorized through the LOA is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under the regulations. See Table 1 in this notice and Table 9 of the rule (86 FR 5322; January 19, 2021).

Small Numbers Determination

Under the GOM rule, NMFS may not authorize incidental take of marine mammals in an LOA if it will exceed "small numbers." In short, when an acceptable estimate of the individual marine mammals taken is available, if the estimated number of individual animals taken is up to, but not greater than, one-third of the best available abundance estimate, NMFS will determine that the numbers of marine mammals taken of a species or stock are small. For more information please see NMFS' discussion of the MMPA's small numbers requirement provided in the final rule (86 FR 5322, 5438; January 19, 2021).


[top] The take numbers for authorization, which are determined as described above, are used by NMFS in making the page 41290 necessary small numbers determinations, through comparison with the best available abundance estimates (see discussion at 86 FR 5322, 5391; January 19, 2021). For this comparison, NMFS' approach is to use the maximum theoretical population, determined through review of current stock assessment reports (SAR; www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments ) and model-predicted abundance information ( https://seamap.env.duke.edu/models/Duke/GOM/ ). For the latter, for taxa where a density surface model could be produced, we use the maximum mean seasonal ( i.e., 3-month) abundance prediction for purposes of comparison as a precautionary smoothing of month-to-month fluctuations and in consideration of a corresponding lack of data in the literature regarding seasonal distribution of marine mammals in the GOM. Information supporting the small numbers determinations is provided in Table 1.

Species Authorized take? 1 Abundance? 2 Percent abundance
Rice's whale 0 51 n/a
Sperm whale 26 2,207 1.2
Kogia spp 3 ?10 4,373 0.2
Beaked whales 116 3,768 3.1
Rough-toothed dolphin 20 4,853 0.4
Bottlenose dolphin 95 176,108 0.1
Clymene dolphin 56 11,895 0.5
Atlantic spotted dolphin 38 74,785 0.1
Pantropical spotted dolphin 255 102,361 0.2
Spinner dolphin 68 25,114 0.3
Striped dolphin 22 5,229 0.4
Fraser's dolphin 6 1,665 0.4
Risso's dolphin 17 3,764 0.4
Melon-headed whale 37 7,003 0.5
Pygmy killer whale 9 2,126 0.4
False killer whale 14 3,204 0.4
Killer whale 0 267 n/a
Short-finned pilot whale 11 1,981 0.5
1 ?Scalar ratios were not applied in this case due to brief survey duration.
2 ?Best abundance estimate. For most taxa, the best abundance estimate for purposes of comparison with take estimates is considered here to be the model-predicted abundance (Roberts et al., 2016). For those taxa where a density surface model predicting abundance by month was produced, the maximum mean seasonal abundance was used. For those taxa where abundance is not predicted by month, only mean annual abundance is available. For the killer whale, the larger estimated SAR abundance estimate is used.
3 ?Includes 1 takes by Level A harassment and 9 takes by Level B harassment.

Based on the analysis contained herein of QuarterNorth's proposed survey activity described in its LOA application and the anticipated take of marine mammals, NMFS finds that small numbers of marine mammals will be taken relative to the affected species or stock sizes and therefore is of no more than small numbers.

Authorization

NMFS has determined that the level of taking for this LOA request is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under the incidental take regulations and that the amount of take authorized under the LOA is of no more than small numbers. Accordingly, we have issued an LOA to QuarterNorth authorizing the take of marine mammals incidental to its geophysical survey activity, as described above.

Dated: July 5, 2022.

Kimberly Damon-Randall,

Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2022-14740 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P