79 FR 22 pgs. 6112-6116 - Maximum Civil Money Penalty Amounts; Civil Money Penalty Complaints
Type: PRORULEVolume: 79Number: 22Pages: 6112 - 6116
Pages: 6112, 6113, 6114, 6115, 6116Docket number: [Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0113]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2014-02149 Filed 1-31-14; 8:45 am]
Agency: Health and Human Services Department
Sub Agency: Food and Drug Administration
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0113]
Maximum Civil Money Penalty Amounts; Civil Money Penalty Complaints
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
[top] The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing this companion proposed rule to the direct final rule, issuing a new regulation to adjust for inflation the maximum civil money penalty (CMP) amounts for the various CMP authorities within our jurisdiction and to amend the process for initiating certain CMP administrative actions. We are taking these actions to comply with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990
DATES:
Submit either electronic or written comments on the proposed rule by April 21, 2014. If FDA receives any significant adverse comments, the Agency will publish a document in the Federal Register withdrawing the direct final rule within 30 days after the comment period ends. FDA will then proceed to respond to comments under this proposed rule using the usual notice and comment procedures.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0113, by any of the following methods.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name and Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0113 for this rulemaking. All comments received may be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For additional information on submitting comments, see the "Comments" heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the "Search" box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jarilyn Dupont, Office of Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903, 301-796-4830.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The last CMP adjustment was published in the Federal Register of November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66750).
I. Background
A. CMP Amounts
FDA is amending § 17.2 (21 CFR 17.2) to update the maximum CMP amounts. In general, FCPIAA requires Federal Agencies to issue regulations to adjust for inflation each CMP provided by law within their jurisdiction. (28 U.S.C. 2461 note, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 3701)). FCPIAA directs Agencies to adjust the CMP provided by law by October 23, 1996, and to make additional adjustments at least once every 4 years thereafter. The adjustments are based on changes in the cost of living, and the FCPIAA defines the cost of living adjustment as the percentage (if any) for each civil monetary penalty by which the Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar year preceding the adjustment, exceeds the Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar year in which the amount of such civil monetary penalty was last set or adjusted pursuant to law (28 U.S.C. 2461 note, section 5(b)).
FCPIAA also prescribes a rounding method based on the size of the penalty after the calculated increase, but states that the adjustment of a CMP may not exceed 10 percent of the penalty. FCPIAA defines a CMP as any penalty, fine, or other sanction that is for a specific monetary amount as provided by Federal law, or has a maximum amount provided for by Federal law, and is assessed or enforced by an agency pursuant to Federal law, and is assessed or enforced pursuant to an administrative proceeding or a civil action in the Federal Courts (28 U.S.C. 2461 note, section 3(2)).
B. CMP Complaints
Currently, under § 17.5(a) (21 CFR 17.5(a)), CMP complaints against retailers of tobacco products may only be signed by attorneys in FDA's Office of the Chief Counsel (OCC). Given the routine nature of many of these CMPs, FDA is amending this regulation to permit the Chief Counsel to designate other FDA staff, such as those in FDA's Center for Tobacco Products, to sign a tobacco retailer CMP complaint.
Based on FDA's experience, the large majority of the tobacco retailer complaints to date have involved alleged violations of the requirement to not sell cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to any person younger than 18 years of age or to verify age in accordance with 21 CFR 1140.14(b). These complaints have almost always been straightforward, they involve simple fact patterns, and they do not require a complex legal analysis. Over time, such CMP complaints have increased in volume, and we anticipate that the volume will continue to be relatively high.
We have determined that, with certain limitations and controls, non-attorney staff outside OCC can carry out the function of reviewing the evidence and signing the tobacco retailer CMP complaints in appropriate circumstances. The proposed amendment to § 17.5(a) would give this decisionmaking authority to the Chief Counsel, who could ensure the authority to sign complaints is only given to appropriate staff and under appropriate circumstances. Under the proposal, the Chief Counsel would have the authority to set and revise limitations and controls, and to broaden, limit, or rescind any authorizations to sign tobacco retailer CMP complaints.
The limitations could include, for example, limiting the delegation to situations where the CMP amount is below a certain dollar value; the CMP involves specified tobacco retailer charges that OCC has determined are routine and predictable and do not require a complex legal analysis; and involve charges for which FDA has developed OCC-approved templates, parameters, and procedures. The controls could include, for example, an audit or other quality review.
This proposed rule incorporates requirements specifically set forth in the FCPIAA requiring FDA to issue a regulation implementing inflation adjustments for all its CMP provisions. These technical changes, required by law, do not substantively alter the existing regulatory framework, nor do they in any way affect the terms under which CMPs are assessed by FDA. The formula for the amount of the penalty adjustment is prescribed by Congress in the FCPIAA, and these changes are not subject to the exercise of discretion by FDA. The amendment to § 17.5(a) changes an internal process.
[top] This proposed rule is a companion to the direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register . This companion proposed rule and the direct final rule are identical in substance. This companion proposed rule will provide the procedural framework to proceed with standard notice-and-comment rulemaking in the event the direct final rule receives significant adverse comment and is
A significant adverse comment is one that explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without change. A comment recommending a rule change in addition to this rule will not be considered a significant adverse comment unless the comment states why this rule would be ineffective without the additional change.
If no significant adverse comment is received in response to the direct final rule, no further action will be taken related to the companion proposed rule. Instead, we will publish a confirmation notice in the Federal Register within 30 days after the comment period ends. We intend the direct final rule to become effective 30 days after publication of the confirmation notice.
If we receive significant adverse comments, we will withdraw the direct final rule. We will proceed to respond to all the comments received regarding the direct final rule, treating those comments as comments to this proposed rule. The Agency will address the comments in the subsequent final rule. We will not provide additional opportunity for comment. If we receive a significant adverse comment that applies to part of the rule and that part may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of significant adverse comment.
For additional background information, see the corresponding direct final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register .
This proposed rule:
• Revises the table in § 17.2 to adjust the maximum CMP amounts for inflation as prescribed by FCPIAA.
• Revises § 17.5(a) to provide authority for the Chief Counsel to delegate the responsibility for initiating a CMP administrative action against a tobacco retailer.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33 that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no collection of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
IV. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly, the Agency has concluded that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a federalism summary impact statement is not required.
V. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct Agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Agency believes that this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule on small entities. Because the proposed rule simply adjusts the maximum amount of CMPs administered by FDA, the adjustment is required by the FCPIAA, and the proposed rule makes a change to FDA's internal processes, the Agency certifies that the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires that Agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing "any rule that includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year." The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $141 million, using the most current (2012) Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this proposed rule, when finalized, to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or exceed this amount.
VI. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES ). It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act, and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, FDA proposes that 21 CFR part 17 be amended as follows:
PART 17-CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES HEARINGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
21 U.S.C. 331, 333, 337, 351, 352, 355, 360, 360c, 360f, 360i, 360j, 371; 42 U.S.C. 262, 263b, 300aa-28; 5 U.S.C. 554, 555, 556, 557.
2. Section 17.2 is revised to read as follows:
§ 17.2 Maximum penalty amounts.
[top] The following table shows maximum civil monetary penalties associated with the statutory provisions authorizing civil monetary penalties under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or the Public Health Service Act.
[top]
| U.S.C. section | Former maximum penalty amount (in dollars) | Assessment method | Date of last penalty figure or adjustment | Adjusted maximum penalty amount (in dollars) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 U.S.C. | ||||
| 333(b)(2)(A) | 60,000 | For each of the first two violations in any 10-year period | 2013 | 65,000 |
| 333(b)(2)(B) | 1,200,000 | For each violation after the second conviction in any 10-year period | 2013 | 1,275,000 |
| 333(b)(3) | 120,000 | Per violation | 2013 | 130,000 |
| 333(f)(1)(A) | 16,500 | Per violation | 2008 | 16,500 |
| 333(f)(1)(A) | 1,200,000 | For the aggregate of violations | 2013 | 1,275,000 |
| 333(f)(2)(A) | 55,000 | Per individual | 2013 | 60,000 |
| 333(f)(2)(A) | 300,000 | Per "any other person" | 2013 | 325,000 |
| 333(f)(2)(A) | 600,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 650,000 |
| 333(f)(3)(A) | 10,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 11,000 |
| 333(f)(3)(B) | 10,000 | For each day the violation is not corrected after a 30-day period following notification until the violation is corrected | 2013 | 11,000 |
| 333(f)(4)(A)(i) | 250,000 | Per violation | 2013 | 275,000 |
| 333(f)(4)(A)(i) | 1,000,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 1,075,000 |
| 333(f)(4)(A)(ii) | 250,000 | For the first 30-day period (or any portion thereof) of continued violation following notification | 2013 | 275,000 |
| 333(f)(4)(A)(ii) | 1,000,000 | For any 30-day period, where the amount doubles for every 30-day period of continued violation after the first 30-day violation | 2013 | 1,075,000 |
| 333(f)(4)(A)(ii) | 10,000,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 10,850,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(A) | 15,000 | Per violation | 2009 | 15,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(A) | 1,000,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 1,050,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(i)(I) | 250,000 | Per violation | 2013 | 275,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(i)(I) | 1,000,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 1,050,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(i)(II) | 250,000 | For the first 30-day period (or any portion thereof) of continued violation following notification | 2013 | 275,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(i)(II) | 1,000,000 | For any 30-day period, where the amount doubles for every 30-day period of continued violation after the first 30-day violation | 2013 | 1,050,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(i)(II) | 10,000,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 10,525,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(ii)(I) | 250,000 | Per violation | 2013 | 275,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(ii)(I) | 1,000,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 1,050,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(ii)(II) | 250,000 | For the first 30-day period (or any portion thereof) of continued violation following notification | 2013 | 275,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(ii)(II) | 1,000,000 | For any 30-day period, where the amount doubles for every 30-day period of continued violation after the first 30-day violation | 2013 | 1,050,000 |
| 333(f)(9)(B)(ii)(II) | 10,000,000 | For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding | 2013 | 10,525,000 |
| 333(g)(1) | 250,000 | For the first violation in any 3-year period | 2013 | 275,000 |
| 333(g)(1) | 500,000 | For each subsequent violation in any 3-year period | 2013 | 550,000 |
| 333 note | 250 | For the second violation (following a first violation with a warning) within a 12-month period by a retailer with an approved training program | 2009 | 250 |
| 333 note | 500 | For the third violation within a 24-month period by a retailer with an approved training program | 2009 | 500 |
| 333 note | 2,000 | For the fourth violation within a 24-month period by a retailer with an approved training program | 2009 | 2,000 |
| 333 note | 5,000 | For the fifth violation within a 36-month period by a retailer with an approved training program | 2009 | 5,000 |
| 333 note | 10,000 | For the sixth or subsequent violation within a 48-month period by a retailer with an approved training program | 2013 | 11,000 |
| 333 note | 250 | For the first violation by a retailer without an approved training program | 2009 | 250 |
| 333 note | 500 | For the second violation within a 12-month period by a retailer without an approved training program | 2009 | 500 |
| 333 note | 1,000 | For the third violation within a 24-month period by a retailer without an approved training program | 2013 | 1,100 |
| 333 note | 2,000 | For the fourth violation within a 24-month period by a retailer without an approved training program | 2009 | 2,000 |
| 333 note | 5,000 | For the fifth violation within a 36-month period by a retailer without an approved training program | 2009 | 5,000 |
| 333 note | 10,000 | For the sixth or subsequent violation within a 48-month period by a retailer without an approved training program | 2013 | 11,000 |
| 335b(a) | 300,000 | Per violation for an individual | 2013 | 325,000 |
| 335b(a) | 1,200,000 | Per violation for "any other person" | 2013 | 1,275,000 |
| 360pp(b)(1) | 1,100 | Per violation per person | 2008 | 1,100 |
| 360pp(b)(1) | 355,000 | For any related series of violations | 2013 | 375,000 |
| 42 U.S.C. | ||||
| 263b(h)(3) | 11,000 | Per violation | 2008 | 11,000 |
| 300aa-28(b)(1) | 120,000 | Per occurrence | 2013 | 130,000 |
| 1 Not adjusted. | ||||
3. In § 17.5, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 17.5 Complaint.
(a) The Center with principal jurisdiction over the matter involved shall begin all administrative civil money penalty actions by serving on the respondent(s) a complaint signed by the Office of the Chief Counsel attorney for the Center and by filing a copy of the complaint with the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. For a civil money penalty action against retailers of tobacco products, the complaint may be signed by any Agency employee designated by the Chief Counsel.
Dated: January 28, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-02149 Filed 1-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P