78 FR 249 pgs. 79025-79026 - New Postal Product
Type: NOTICEVolume: 78Number: 249Pages: 79025 - 79026
Pages: 79025, 79026Docket number: [Docket Nos. MC2014-13 and CP2014-17; Order No. 1920]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2013-30973 Filed 12-26-13; 8:45 am]
Agency: Postal Regulatory Commission
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2014-13 and CP2014-17; Order No. 1920]
New Postal Product
AGENCY:
Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing requesting the addition of Priority Mail Express Contract 17 to the competitive product list. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.
DATES:
Comments are due: December 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing Online system at http://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filings
III. Request for Supplemental Information
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service filed a formal request and associated supporting information to add Priority Mail Express Contract 17 to the competitive product list.1The Postal Service asserts that Priority Mail Express Contract 17 is a competitive product "not of general applicability" within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2014-13.
Footnotes:
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 17 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted Governors' Decision, Contract, and Supporting Data, December 19, 2013 (Request).
The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract related to the proposed new product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR 3015.5. Id. Attachment B. The instant contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2014-17.
Request. To support its Request, the Postal Service filed six attachments as follows:
• Attachment A-a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No. 11-6, authorizing the new product;
• Attachment B-a redacted copy of the contract;
• Attachment C-proposed changes to the Mail Classification Schedule competitive product list with the addition underlined;
• Attachment D-a Statement of Supporting Justification as required by 39 CFR 3020.32;
• Attachment E-a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and
• Attachment F-an application for non-public treatment of materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract and related financial information under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Dennis R. Nicoski, Manager, Field Sales Strategy and Contracts, asserts that the contract will cover its attributable costs, make a positive contribution to covering institutional costs, and increase contribution toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service's total institutional costs. Id. Attachment D at 1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will be no issue of market dominant products subsidizing competitive products as a result of this contract. Id.
[top] Related contract. The Postal Service included a redacted version of the related contract with the Request. Id. Attachment B. The contract will expire three years from the effective date unless, among other things, the customer terminates the agreement, with or without cause and without penalty, upon 60 days' written notice to the other party or the agreement is renewed by mutual written agreement. Id. at 4. The contract also allows two 90-day extensions of the agreement if the preparation of a successor agreement is active and the Commission is notified within at least seven days of the contract's expiration date. Id. The Postal
Footnotes:
2 Although the Request appears to state that the certification only pertains to paragraphs (1) and (3) of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), the certification itself contains an assertion that the prices are in compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1), (2), and (3). See Request at 2; Attachment E.
The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials, including the related contract, under seal. Id. Attachment F. It maintains that the redacted portions of the Governors' Decision, contract, customer-identifying information, and related financial information, should remain confidential. Id. at 3. This information includes the price structure, underlying costs and assumptions, pricing formulas, information relevant to the customer's mailing profile, and cost coverage projections. Id. The Postal Service asks the Commission to protect customer-identifying information from public disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2014-13 and CP2014-17 to consider the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail Express Contract 17 product and the related contract, respectively.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal Service's filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5, and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comments are due no later than December 30, 2013. The public portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission's Web site ( http://www.prc.gov ).
The Commission appoints Curtis E. Kidd to serve as Public Representative in these dockets.
III. Request for Supplemental Information
Section I.B. of the contract defines the "Effective Date" as "the day following the date on which the Commission issues all necessary regulatory approval." Request, Attachment B at 1. Section III of the contract provides that the "Effective Date of this Contract shall be one business day following the day on which the Commission issues all necessary regulatory approval." Id. at 4. The Postal Service is requested to clarify which provision is controlling, and, if necessary, file an amendment to the contract. The Postal Service response is due no later than December 27, 2013.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2014-13 and CP2014-17 to consider the matters raised in each docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Curtis E. Kidd is appointed to serve as an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in these proceedings (Public Representative).
3. The response to the request for supplemental information is due no later than December 27, 2013.
4. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no later than December 30, 2013.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register .
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-30973 Filed 12-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P