78 FR 230 pgs. 71688-71689 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend CBOE Rule 6.42
Type: NOTICEVolume: 78Number: 230Pages: 71688 - 71689
Pages: 71688, 71689Docket number: [Release No. 34-70930; File No. SR-CBOE-2013-093]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2013-28573 Filed 11-27-13; 8:45 am]
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70930; File No. SR-CBOE-2013-093]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend CBOE Rule 6.42
November 22, 2013.
I. Introduction
On September 27, 2013, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the "Exchange" or "CBOE") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act")1and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2a proposed rule change to amend CBOE Rule 6.42, "Minimum Increments for Bids and Offers," to establish a minimum quoting increment for complex orders. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on October 22, 2013.3The Commission received no comment letters regarding the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
Footnotes:
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70618 (October 7, 2013), 78 FR 62887 ("Notice").
II. Description of the Proposal
[top] Currently, CBOE Rule 6.42(4) provides that bids and offers on complex orders may be expressed in any increment regardless of the minimum increments otherwise appropriate to the individual legs of the order.4CBOE
Footnotes:
4 For the purposes of CBOE Rule 6.42, a complex order is a spread, straddle, combination, or ratio order as defined in CBOE Rule 6.53, a stock-option order as defined in CBOE Rule 1.1(ii), a security future-option order as defined in Rule 1.1(zz), or any other complex order as defined in CBOE Rule 6.53C. See CBOE Rule 6.42, Interpretation and Policy .01.
5 See Notice 78 FR at 62887.
6 CBOE states that the rule would allow the Exchange to establish uniform complex order quoting increments within a class, and to set and vary the minimum complex order quoting increments for different classes in response to different market conditions in those classes and to encourage more trading in those classes. CBOE notes that its rules currently allow it to establish minimum quoting increments for complex orders in options on the S&P 500 Index ("SPX"), the p.m.-settled S&P 500 Index ("SPXPM"), and on the S&P 100 Index ("OEX" and "XEO"). See Notice 78 FR at 62888 and CBOE Rule 6.42(4).
7 See Notice 78 FR at 62888.
8 See id. at note 4.
According to CBOE, many web-based services that public customers use to enter options orders do not permit the entry of orders in sub-penny increments, a limitation that other market participants may not face.9CBOE believes that the proposal will establish a minimum complex order quoting increment that all market participants will be able to monitor and in which all market participants will be able to enter orders.10In addition, because CBOE's electronic complex order execution systems, the Complex Order Book ("COB") and Complex Order Auction ("COA"), are not configured to permit quoting in sub-penny increments, the $0.01 minimum increment would place electronic and manually entered complex orders on an even footing.11CBOE also believes that establishing a minimum quoting increment of $0.01 will assure that price improvement occurs at a meaningful increment, and will prevent market participants from jumping ahead of an existing quote by providing a de minimus amount of price improvement.12
Footnotes:
9 See Notice 78 FR at 62887.
10 See id.
11 See Notice 78 FR at 62887-62888. See also CBOE Rules 6.53C(c)(ii) and 6.53C(d)(iii)(1) (providing for quoting increments of no less than $0.01 in the COB and Requests for Responses ("RFRs") in increments of no less than $0.01 in the COA). CBOE notes that the $0.01 minimum increment would prevent sophisticated market participants from manually entering complex order quotations in sub-penny amounts. See Notice 78 FR at 62888, note 5.
12 See Notice 78 FR at 62888.
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.13In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,14which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. As discussed above, CBOE Rule 6.42(4) currently allows bids and offers for complex orders to be expressed in any increment, which potentially could permit bids and offers for complex orders to be expressed in increments smaller than $0.01. In contrast, complex orders entered in the COB and RFR Responses to a COA auction may not be entered in increments smaller than $0.01.15Thus, under CBOE's current rules, complex orders that are entered manually potentially could be entered in increments smaller than $0.01, while complex order trading interest entered electronically in the COB and the COA may not be entered in increments smaller than $0.01. By establishing a $0.01 minimum quoting increment for complex orders, the proposal is designed to protect investors by establishing a consistent minimum quoting increment for complex orders that are entered manually and complex orders that are entered electronically through the COB and COA.
Footnotes:
13 In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
15 See CBOE Rules 6.53C(c)(ii) and (d)(iii)(1).
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,16that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-2013-093) is approved.
Footnotes:
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.17
Footnotes:
17 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-28573 Filed 11-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P