78 FR 3 pgs. 766-769 - Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

Type: NOTICEVolume: 78Number: 3Pages: 766 - 769
FR document: [FR Doc. 2012-31661 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
Agency: Labor Department
Sub Agency: Employment and Training Administration
Official PDF Version:  PDF Version

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of December 3, 2012 through December 7, 2012.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and

(3) One of the following must be satisfied:

(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased;

(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased;

(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased;

(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and

(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) One of the following must be satisfied:

(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;

(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and

(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) Either-

(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.

(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in-

(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);

(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or

(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));

(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the date on which-

(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or

(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register ; and

(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers' firm within-

(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
81,923 GE Lighting, Inc., Ohio Lamp Plant, Including Workers From OSS, Inc Warren, OH October 30, 2011.
81,923A Randstad Working On-Site at GE Lighting, Inc., Ohio Lamp Plant Warren, OH August 24, 2011.
82,078 Amsted Rail Co., Inc., Kelly Services, Accountemps & Office Team, Partners Personnel, etc Granite City, IL October 12, 2011.
82,157 Henkel-Harris Company, Inc., Manpower and Spherion Staffing LLC Winchester, VA November 14, 2011.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
81,968 Verizon Business Networks Services, Inc., Senior Analysts-Sales Implementation (SA-SI) Birmingham, AL September 13, 2011.
81,968A Verizon Business Networks Services, Inc., Senior Analysts-Sales Implementation (SA-SI), Service Program Delivery San Francisco, CA September 13, 2011.
82,033 Avaya, Inc., Avaya Client Services (ACS) Portfolio and Operations Westminster, CO October 1, 2011.
82,033A Avaya, Inc., Avaya Client Services (ACS) Portfolio and Operations Highlands Ranch, CO October 1, 2011.
82,033B Avaya, Inc., Avaya Client Services (ACS) Portfolio and Operations Carrollton, TX October 1, 2011.
82,064 AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Hoover and Mobile, AL September 13, 2011.
82,064A AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Dublin and Seven Other Cities, CA September 13, 2011.
82,064B AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management New Haven and Norwalk, CT September 13, 2011.
82,064C AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Lake Mary, Miami, and Orlando, FL September 13, 2011.
82,064D AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Alpharetta and Atlanta, GA September 13, 2011.
82,064E AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Chicago, Hoffman Estates, and Peoria, IL September 13, 2011.
82,064F AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Indianapolis, IN September 13, 2011.
82,064G AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Framingham, MA September 13, 2011.
82,064H AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Hanover, MD September 13, 2011.
82,064I AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Southfield, MI September 13, 2011.
82,064J AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Ballwin, Kansas City, and Saint Louis, MO September 13, 2011.
82,064K AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Charlotte, NC September 13, 2011.
82,064L AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Bedminster and Six Others, NJ September 13, 2011.
82,064M AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Akron, Brecksville, and Canton, OH September 13, 2011.
82,064N AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Oklahoma City, OK September 13, 2011.
82,064O AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management King of Prussia and Philadelphia, PA September 13, 2011.
82,064P AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Allen and Seven Others, TX September 13, 2011.
82,064Q AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Spokane Valley, WA September 13, 2011.
82,064R AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Waukesha, WI September 13, 2011.
82,064S AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology Operations, Global Systems Hosting Application & Service Management Triadelphia, WV September 13, 2011.
82,068 Stanadyne Corporation, Windsor Division, Infinistaff Windsor, CT October 10, 2011.
82,080 International Business Machines (IBM), Integrated Technology Services Ops, GTS Business Operations (GTS), Manpower Armonk, NY October 11, 2011.
82,093 Korean Air Line Company LTD., American Regional Headquarters Call Center Division, Seoul of Korean Air Los Angeles, CA October 17, 2011.
82,125 Honeywell International, Inc., Sensing and Control, Manpower and GDKN Mars Hill, NC October 24, 2011.
82,128 SST Truck Company, LLC, Navistar, Inc., Employee Solutions, Populus, & ODW Contract Services Garland, TX November 2, 2011.
82,132 Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, Infrastructure Business Unit Hillsboro, OR November 2, 2011.
82,132A Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, Sales Department, Excluding Customer Service Hillsboro, OR November 2, 2011.
82,132B Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, Finance Department, Bolly Welch, Resources Connection, Slalom, etc Hillsboro, OR November 2, 2011.
82,132C Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, Corporate Marketing Department Hillsboro, OR November 2, 2011.
82,135 The Hospital of Central Connecticut, The Central Connecticut Health Alliance New Britain, CT November 6, 2011.
82,135A The Hospital of Central Connecticut, The Central Connecticut Health Alliance Southington, CT November 6, 2011.
82,139 Avery Dennison, Retail Branding and Information Solutions Division (RBIS), Adecco Lenoir, NC September 3, 2012.
82,139A Leased Workers From Manpower, Working On-Site At Avery Dennison, Retail Branding and Inform (RBIS) Lenoir, NC November 8, 2011.
82,147 Northwest Publications dba St. Paul Pioneer Press, Subsidiary Medianews Group, Advertising Production Division Saint Paul, MN November 9, 2011.
82,150 Badger Meter, Inc Milwaukee, WI April 29, 2012.
82,150A Teksystems, Working On-Site at Badger Meter, Inc Milwaukee, WI November 12, 2011.
82,153 Solae, LLC, Solae Holdings, G4S Secure, Alpha Mechanical, R&K, Robert P. James Louisville, KY November 8, 2011.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
82,171 Pearson Education, Inc., Pearson Imaging Center Upper Saddle River, NJ November 21, 2011.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified.

The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
82,100 NXP Semiconductors, Supply Chain Management Group San Jose, CA.

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
81,826 Konarka Technologies New Bedford, MA
81,826A Konarka Technologies Lowell, MA
82,142 Axle Tech International, A General Dynamics Company, OshKosh Division Oshkosh, WI

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
81,946 Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., Senior Analyst-Sales Implementation, Service Program Delivery Division San Francisco, CA.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of December 3, 2012 through December 7, 2012. These determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/taa search form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-365-6822.

Dated: December 12, 2012.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-31661 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P