75 FR 126 pgs. 38139-38143 - Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

Type: NOTICEVolume: 75Number: 126Pages: 38139 - 38143
FR document: [FR Doc. 2010-16025 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]
Agency: Labor Department
Sub Agency: Employment and Training Administration
Official PDF Version:  PDF Version

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met.

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and

(3) One of the following must be satisfied:

(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased;

(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased;

(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased;

(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and

(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) One of the following must be satisfied:

(A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;

(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and

(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(c) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) Either-

(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(f) of the Act must be met.

(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in-

(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);

(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or

(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));

(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the date on which-

(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or

(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register ; and

(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers' firm within-

(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W Subject firm Location Impact date
72,811 Holo-Krome, Former Subsidiary of Danaher Tool Group, Leased Workers of Randstad West Hartford, CT November 4, 2008.
72,839 United States Metal Powders, Inc., Formerly, United States Bronze Powders, Leased Workers Theorem Corporation Flemington, NJ November 6, 2008.
73,648 Gelita USA Inc., Leased Workers of Advance Services and Manpower Sergeant Bluff, IA March 3, 2009.
73,936 ATI Wah Chang, Allegheny Technologies, Inc Albany, OR April 14, 2009.
73,942 Total Lubricants USA, Inc., A Subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine, Inc Rockingham, NC April 9, 2009.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W Subject firm Location Impact date
71,551A Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Networking and Multimedia Group, Leased Workers of Synergy Services, etc Austin, TX July 1, 2008.
72,332 Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems, LLC, Commercial Vehicle Systems, ArvinMeritor, Leased Workers Pinnacle Fletcher, NC September 16, 2008.
72,487 JP Morgan Chase and Company, Treasury and Securities Services, Automated Clearing House Operations Belleville, MI October 1, 2008.
72,615 International Thermal Systems LLC, Leased Workers Argus, Faith Technologies, Products Services, etc Milwaukee, WI October 16, 2008.
73,178 Alcatel-Lucent USA, Operations Division, Alcatel-Lucent Raleigh, NC December 10, 2008.
73,229 Barnes Aerospace, Barnes Group, Inc.; Leased Workers from Diversified Design West Chester, OH January 5, 2009.
73,330 Springs Global U.S., Inc., Leased Workers from Phillips Staffing and Aquent Fort Mill, SC January 20, 2009.
73,330A Springs Global U.S., Inc., Leased Workers from 24 Seven, Inc New York, NY January 20, 2009.
73,330B Springs Global U.S., Inc. Bentonville, AR January 20, 2009.
73,330C Springs Global U.S., Inc. Minneapolis, MN January 20, 2009.
73,330D Springs Global U.S., Inc. Plano, TX January 20, 2009.
73,402 Springs Window Fashions, LLC, Springs Industries, Inc Santa Ana, CA February 1, 2009.
73,476 Corning Cable Systems, Leased Workers from Adecco Keller, TX February 10, 2009.
73,529 ACS Enterprise Solutions, Inc., Waite Park Branch, Affiliate Of Affiliated Computer Services, (aka AVS, Xerox Company) Waite Park, MN December 16, 2008.
73,790 MeadWestvaco Corporation, Global Business Services, Leased Workers from Manpower, etc Glen Allen, VA March 19, 2009.
73,798 CompuCredit Holdings Corporation, Formerly CompuCredit Corporation, Credit Cards-Collections Division Wilkesboro, NC March 25, 2009.
73,969 Cummins, Inc., Cummins Components Fuel Systems Business Unit, Leased Workers of Volt, etc El Paso, TX April 19, 2009.
73,984 Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company, Lincoln & Allen Division, Leased Workers of Hands On Demand, Inc Portland, OR April 21, 2009.
73,984A Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company Portland, OR April 21, 2009.
73,985 Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company, Haagen Print Division Santa Barbara, CA April 21, 2009.
73,994 Lipper, Thomson Reuters Market, Leased Workers Job Store Staffing, etc Denver, CO April 23, 2009.
74,006 CIGNA Healthcare, Inc., Customer Service Department, Leased Workers from Prounlimited Fort Scott, KS April 26, 2009.
74,013 WellPoint, Inc., West Host Provider, Leased Workers from Kelly Services, etc Denver, CO April 27, 2009.
74,027 UPS Supply Chain Solutions, United Parcel Service, Leased Workers Manpower, Spherion etc Dunmore, PA April 21, 2009.
74,060 Ingersoll Rand, Hussman Corporation, Climate Solutions, Leased Workers from Procure Staff Bridgeton, MO April 5, 2009.
74,075 Covance Research Products, Leased Workers from Aerotek and WSI Kalamazoo, MI May 11, 2009.
74,087 IMS Health Incorporated, Shared Business Services Division, Leased Workers Kelly Services Bethlehem, PA May 13, 2009.
74,121 Magna Modular Systems, AIM Systems-St. Louis, Magna International America Dupo, IL May 18, 2009.
74,155 Atlas Copco, Secoroc, LLC, Leased Workers Express Employment Professionals Roanoke, VA May 24, 2009.
74,213 Intel Corporation, Corporate Services, D2 Operations Santa Clara, CA July 8, 2010.
74,214 Intel Corporation, California Technology and Manufacturing, D2 Operations Santa Clara, CA May 15, 2010.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W Subject firm Location Impact date
72,481 Fulton Manufacturing Industries, LLC Brecksville, OH October 2, 2008.
72,703 Young Touchstone, Wabtec Corporation Lexington, TN October 27, 2008.
73,077 Grupo Antolin, Grupo Antolin North America Belvidere, IL December 9, 2008.
73,598 Biotech Industries, LLC Newton, NC February 28, 2009.
73,946 Kirkhill-TA Co., Haskon Division; Esterline Technologies; Leased Workers from Spherion Taunton, MA April 15, 2009.
73,959 RJR Transportation, Inc. Lathrop, CA March 22, 2009.
74,069 Nestaway LLC, Subsidiary of Leggett and Platt McKenzie, TN May 7, 2009.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W Subject firm Location Impact date
72,219 USF Holland, Inc., A Subsidiary of YRC Worldwide, Inc. Jackson, MI September 3, 2008.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified.

The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
73,751 RHealth, LLC Memphis, TN

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
72,018 Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc Portland, CT
72,037 General Cable Industries, Inc., General Cable Corporation, Leased Workers Nesco Resources, etc Lawrenceburg, KY
72,239 Runia Transportation, Inc. Eugene, OR
72,410 DSC Window Fashions, Inc. Portland, OR
72,908 Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, Embarq Corporation; CenturyLink, New Bern Call Center New Bern, NC
72,916 Dowell Schlumberger Sonora, TX
73,012 Oldcastle Glass Engineered Products Bloomsburg, PA
73,436 Rexam Healthcare Packaging, Inc. Rossville, GA
73,517 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc., Key Account Manager (KAM) Group Plano, TX
73,560 BCD Travel USA, LLC, Boise Siemens Unit Boise, ID
73,840 Lochmoor Chrysler Jeep Detroit, MI
73,989 United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 136 Fenton, MO
74,057 Specialty Minerals, Inc. Franklin, VA

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) (public agency acquisition of services from a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
73,103 Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow, CA
74,116 Washington Department of Transportation, Olympic Division, Aberdeen Maintenance, Chehalis Drawbridge Tenders Aberdeen, WA

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
72,146 Dassault Systemes Americas Corporation Woodland Hills, CA
73,177 Century Aluminum of Kentucky, GP Hawesville, KY
73,825 Steel Fabricators of Monroe, LLC Monroe, LA

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
73,708 Hayden Twist Drill Warren, MI

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
72,277 Hickory White Upholstery High Point, NC
72,939 Span America Inc. Worcester, PA
73,835 Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Medical Bill Processing and Production Center Support Syracuse, NY

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the Department's previous negative determination, and therefore, further investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose.

TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
72,947 Supreme Foam, Inc. Archdale, NC

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department's Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations.

Dated: June 24, 2010.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-16025 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-PS