75 FR 226 pgs. 71525-71526 - Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the Chicago, IL; Fort Wayne-Marion, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas
Type: RULEVolume: 75Number: 226Pages: 71525 - 71526
FR document: [FR Doc. 2010-29660 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
Agency: OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AM21
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the Chicago, IL; Fort Wayne-Marion, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas
AGENCY:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing a final rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of the Chicago, IL; Fort Wayne-Marion, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA, appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. The final rule redefines Benton County, IN, from the Chicago wage area to the Indianapolis wage area; Carroll and Howard Counties, IN, from the Fort Wayne-Marion wage area to the Indianapolis wage area; and Carroll County, OH, from the Pittsburgh wage area to the Cleveland wage area. These changes are based on recent consensus recommendations of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee to best match the above counties to a nearby FWS survey area. FPRAC recommended no other changes in the geographic definitions of the Chicago, Fort Wayne-Marion, Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh FWS wage areas.
DATES:
This regulation is effective on December 27, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; e-mail pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On July 9, 2010, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a proposed rule (75 FR 39460) to redefine Benton County, IN, from the Chicago, IL, wage area to the Indianapolis, IN, wage area; Carroll and Howard Counties, IN, from the Fort Wayne-Marion, IN, wage area to the Indianapolis wage area; and Carroll County, OH, from the Pittsburgh, PA, wage area to the Cleveland, OH, wage area. These changes are based on recent consensus recommendations of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee to best match the above counties to a nearby FWS survey area. The proposed rule had a 30-day comment period during which OPM received no comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will affect only Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management amends 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532-PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532-Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas
2. Appendix C to subpart B is amended by revising the wage area listings for the Chicago, IL; Fort Wayne-Marion, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA, wage areas to read as follows:
***** | |
ILLINOIS | |
***** | |
CHICAGO | |
Survey Area | |
Illinois: | |
Cook | |
Du Page | |
Kane | |
Lake | |
McHenry | |
Will | |
Area of Application. Survey area plus: | |
Illinois: | |
Boone | |
De Kalb | |
Grundy | |
Iroquois | |
Kankakee | |
Kendall | |
LaSalle | |
Lee | |
Livingston | |
Ogle | |
Stephenson | |
Winnebago | |
Indiana: | |
Jasper | |
Lake | |
La Porte | |
Newton | |
Porter | |
Pulaski | |
Starke | |
Wisconsin: | |
Kenosha | |
**** | |
INDIANA | |
***** | |
FORT WAYNE-MARION | |
Survey Area | |
Indiana: | |
Adams | |
Allen | |
DeKalb | |
Grant | |
Huntington | |
Wells | |
Area of Application. Survey area plus: | |
Indiana: | |
Blackford | |
Cass | |
Elkhart | |
Fulton | |
Jay | |
Kosciusko | |
Lagrange | |
Marshall | |
Miami | |
Noble | |
St. Joseph | |
Steuben | |
Wabash | |
White | |
Whitley | |
Ohio: | |
Allen | |
Defiance | |
Fulton | |
Henry | |
Mercer | |
Paulding | |
Putnam | |
Van Wert | |
Williams | |
INDIANAPOLIS | |
Survey Area | |
Indiana: | |
Boone | |
Hamilton | |
Hancock | |
Hendricks | |
Johnson | |
Marion | |
Morgan | |
Shelby | |
Area of Application. Survey area plus: | |
Indiana: | |
Bartholomew | |
Benton | |
Brown | |
Carroll | |
Clay | |
Clinton | |
Decatur | |
Delaware | |
Fayette | |
Fountain | |
Henry | |
Howard | |
Madison | |
Montgomery | |
Parke | |
Putnam | |
Rush | |
Sullivan | |
Tippecanoe | |
Tipton | |
Vermillion | |
Vigo | |
Warren | |
***** | |
OHIO | |
***** | |
CLEVELAND | |
Survey Area | |
Ohio: | |
Cuyahoga | |
Geauga | |
Lake | |
Medina | |
Area of Application. Survey area plus: | |
Ohio: | |
Ashland | |
Ashtabula | |
Carroll | |
Columbiana | |
Erie | |
Huron | |
Lorain | |
Mahoning | |
Ottawa | |
Portage | |
Sandusky | |
Seneca | |
Stark | |
Summit | |
Trumbull | |
Wayne | |
***** | |
PENNSYLVANIA | |
***** | |
PITTSBURGH | |
Survey Area | |
Pennsylvania: | |
Allegheny | |
Beaver | |
Butler | |
Washington | |
Westmoreland | |
Area of Application. Survey area plus: | |
Pennsylvania: | |
Armstrong | |
Bedford | |
Blair | |
Cambria | |
Cameron | |
Centre | |
Clarion | |
Clearfield | |
Clinton | |
Crawford | |
Elk (Does not include the Allegheny National Forest portion) | |
Erie | |
Fayette | |
Forest (Does not include the Allegheny National Forest portion) | |
Greene | |
Huntingdon | |
Indiana | |
Jefferson | |
Lawrence | |
Mercer | |
Potter | |
Somerset | |
Venango | |
Ohio: | |
Belmont | |
Harrison | |
Jefferson | |
Tuscarawas | |
West Virginia: | |
Brooke | |
Hancock | |
Marshall | |
Ohio | |
***** |
[FR Doc. 2010-29660 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P